Infinitary Default Logic for Specification of Nonmonotonic Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we study constructions leading to the formation of belief sets by agents. We focus on the situation when possible belief sets are built incrementally in stages. We call an infinite sequence of theories that represents such a process a reasoning trace. A set of reasoning traces describing all possible reasoning scenarios for the agent is called a reasoning frame. Default logic by Reiter is not powerful enough to represent reasoning frames. In the paper we introduce a generalization of default logic of Reiter by allowing infinite sets of justifications. We call this formalism infinitary default logic. In the main result of the paper we show that every reasoning frame can be represented by an infinitary default theory. A similar representability result for antichains of theories (belief frames) is also presented.
منابع مشابه
Specification of nonmonotonic reasoning
Two levels of description of nonmonotonic reasoning are distinguished. For these levels semantical formalizations are given. The first level is defined semantically by the notion of belief state frame, the second level by the notion of reasoning frame. We introduce two specification languages to describe nonmonotonic reasoning at each of the levels: (1) a specification language for level 1, wit...
متن کاملSpecification of Nonmonotonic Reasonong
Two levels of description of nonmonotonic reasoning are distinguished. For these levels semantical formalizations are given. The first level is defined semantically by the notion of belief state frame, the second level by the notion of reasoning frame. We introduce two specification languages to describe nonmonotonic reasoning at each of the levels: (1) a specification language for level 1, wit...
متن کاملNonmonotonic Belief State Frames and Reasoning Frames (extended abstract)
In this paper five levels of specification of nonmonotonic reasoning are distinguished. The notions of semantical frame, belief state frame and reasoning frame are introduced and used as a semantical basis for the first three levels. Moreover, the semantical connections between the levels are formalized. It is shown that this general semantical framework is applicable for some well-known approa...
متن کاملThe draculasp System: Default Reasoning about Actions and Change Using Logic and Answer Set Programming
We present an implementation for nonmonotonic reasoning about action domains. Its name draculasp stands for “default reasoning about actions and change using logic and answer set programming.” The system compiles action domain specifications from a logic-based input language into answer set programs and invokes an ASP solver to answer queries about the domain. Intelligent agents can use dracula...
متن کاملAxiomatization of Credulous Reasoning in Rational Default Logic
Nonmonotonic reasoning is succesfully formalized by the class of default logics. In this paper we introduce an axiomatic system for credulous reasoning in rational default logic. Based on classical sequent calculus and anti-sequent calculus, an abstract characterization of credulous nonmonotonic default inference in this variant of default logic is presented.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996